Sticking to reality

From one culture to the other

       It appears that many persons can stick to reality in some circumstances, but ge out of this same reality about a certain subject, or in a specific situation.

       More than that, it is the attitude of another person which can trigger off emotions of anger, revolt or violence.

       What are these attitudes? Isn't the educator who can trigger off a denial, an anger in someone from another culture, without being aware of it?

       The non-adhesion to reality can be explained by a study of the functioning of the nervous system, which is proper to psychophysiology. The mechanism explains the closing of the senses, the preponderance of the mind, then the mechanisms of projection of fear of the others and of the environment, and the loss of contact with a precise, physical world.

       The non-adhesion, on the other hand, can be generated by the culture. A Christian had to eat fish on Fridays, for instance, for fear of getting the wrath of the heavens, and without asking themselves on the advice of eating meagre food, that is to say with no meat, at least once a week. Every culture has got its own share of precepts that are impossible to wipe out without alienating the concerned persons from oneself, or lose their confidence.

       To lead the person to question the beliefs that hurt them, or hinder them can be done if explaining them how they hurt themselves.

       This the reason why this workshop proposes an examination of the physiological mechanisms which give way to the loss of contact to reality, et the means to lead a person to question themselves without being confused with their surroundings nor denying their own cultures.